|
|
|
Guest From All Around The World Come to Storytellers Campfire Circle
|
0 |
Oct 9 2009, 2:41 PM EDT by
|
|
|
Thread started: Oct 9 2009, 2:41 PM EDT
Watch
Press Release
October 8, 2009 Storytellers Campfire a radio and internet show featuring literary artist will soon launch their fall/winter program. The show will be featuring guest from all over the world who have contributed to the world of literature, published and unpublished work. “Storytelling in ancient traditions, has been utilized to preserve history, teach, explain and entertain and we need to keep the campfire circle going and we intend to do that with the program.” commented Lady Selah SuJuris; Director of the program. The one hour program has seven main segments that interweave throughout the show; The Authors Voice segment will interview published authors while the Writers Circle will host a variety of guest of unpublished work, soon to be released books, and professionals in the literature industry including journalist and professors. The main part of the program is the “Storyteller”, who shares a story and this is “Where Literary Art Comes To Life”; slogan for the show. Misho’s Library is a talented theatrical reader sharing his rendition of segments from classical literature. The Poetry Wheel, similar to an open mike, will feature guest who want to read their poetry published or unpublished. Ms Mavis is an animated character, who is an animal behavior specialist and shares humorous stories about her cases. Bookworm Trivia will be hosted by a long time radio personality and provides trivia questions which you can email your answers (through instant messenger) or call in and win gift certificates and prizes from National Companies Sponsoring the program. The show which begins airing in November is accepting submissions and interviewing authors, writers, storytellers, folk musicians and professionals in the literary world to be guest on their show. You can visit the website at www.storytellerscampfire.org
Jose Contoocook
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
|
|
Free Writes
|
13 |
Nov 18 2008, 12:47 AM EST by
|
|
|
Thread started: Nov 18 2008, 12:26 AM EST
Watch
Reply to this thread with your free-writes
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
Show Last Reply
|
|
Last Reply:
Chris Armstrong
By: ,
Nov 18 2008, 12:47 AM EST
What I understand about my practices that I didn’t know before is that the way I analyze texts is not very effective compared to people in the academic profession. I think that by seeing how different faculty read and analyze a text, I can improve my own skills and learn to read a text more thoroughly.
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
|
|
|
Mason Klein - Academic Writing
|
0 |
Nov 18 2008, 12:36 AM EST by
|
|
|
Thread started: Nov 18 2008, 12:36 AM EST
Watch
Academic writing I believe is any sort of writing where you as the writer take a point or argue about something, it could also be any writing that really has to do with your education or has to do with school. Academic writing is most likely in a certain essay form. It isn’t something that has many bullets or an outline that you do on some information. Academic writing is something you go over many times to make sure it is in proper form and makes sense, not just a sloppy rough draft that you type up for the first time. The purpose for academic writing is to persuade or explain a point you are taking to your audience. What I think academic writing does is inform the audience your point and provide them with more knowledge about this subject. An academic paper I have written before is a paper where I had to take a point in a controversial issue. I did my paper on abortion and how it should be kept legal. Steps I did to complete this piece of writing were that I first had to look up a bunch of information on the subject. In order to be successful in proving your point you must first be knowledgeable about the subject and have a clean idea of what it is. I then gathered this information and dug up the main information and wrote it down. Another important part of my research was to look up the main reasons again what I was writing. This way I could look up information to counter again these points. Having strong counter points I believe makes a great argument in your paper and really gets the audience to go against a lot of their beliefs. Finding great sources was a key point also. Without good sources the validity of your paper is questioned.
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
|
|
Group #7
|
0 |
Oct 26 2008, 10:43 PM EDT by
|
|
|
Thread started: Oct 26 2008, 10:43 PM EDT
Watch
This paraphrase mainly was different from ours because it focused on the medias influence on teenagers to feel impatient and the old learning styles. My group mainly followed the paragraph exact;y and didn't change up the order of the ideas from the original.
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
|
|
differences
|
0 |
Oct 24 2008, 12:07 PM EDT by
|
|
|
Thread started: Oct 24 2008, 12:07 PM EDT
Watch
Your last sentence and ours was different. We talked about how the internet causes problems for the mind to not be capable of quiet study
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
rsquillace |
|
And....!
|
0 |
Oct 24 2008, 12:04 PM EDT by
rsquillace |
|
|
Thread started: Oct 24 2008, 12:04 PM EDT
Watch
Also, all the ideas were similar. They were just worded quite differently. You seemed to use more complex wording and sentance structure, but I think that might have added more to the depth of the paraphrase and made it more specific.
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
|
|
Analysis
|
0 |
Oct 24 2008, 12:04 PM EDT by
|
|
|
Thread started: Oct 24 2008, 12:04 PM EDT
Watch
Representing first place; group #1 The most similar line was the second sentance, which explained the psychological affect of the information that can be accessed online.
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
|
|
Paraphasing content differences
|
0 |
Oct 24 2008, 12:04 PM EDT by
|
|
|
Thread started: Oct 24 2008, 12:04 PM EDT
Watch
I felt that group ones paragraph was vey well written. It seemed to have they same ideas as ours(group five). The thing I liked best about both of our parphrasings' were that they were easier to understand then Bauerleins original in his writing writing "screen Time". The part that was the most similair for both(group 1 and 5), was the last sentence. Bauerleins last sentence was extremely tough to make sense of, however, after it was paraphrased it was not. Baurlein used words that were really tough to combine and paraphrase. In both instances, group one and group five did a good job of making the sentence make sence and flow smoother.
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
|
|
Content Differences
|
0 |
Oct 24 2008, 12:04 PM EDT by
|
|
|
Thread started: Oct 24 2008, 12:04 PM EDT
Watch
Because of this all having come from the same piece, it seems that the content of group 1 is very similar to group 5. Yet I still notice slight differences. The overall meanings are the same but I thought that it was nice to see all the ways of interpreting some of the same ideas when they all came from one article. I really liked how visual learning was said to "sacrifice independent study." That was a really interesting way to phrase what came from Bauerlein's text.
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
mirandaheby |
|
Comment
|
0 |
Oct 24 2008, 12:03 PM EDT by
mirandaheby |
|
|
Thread started: Oct 24 2008, 12:03 PM EDT
Watch
Miranda Eby (group 2): You used different forms of paraphrasing. You summarized, thoroughly explained and used short quotes. We used mostly explaining and it made ours pretty long. I think yours is slightly shorter than ours.
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
|
|
Content Differences
|
0 |
Oct 24 2008, 12:03 PM EDT by
|
|
|
Thread started: Oct 24 2008, 12:03 PM EDT
Watch
Due to how everyone was paraphrasing the same part of the text, the paraphrase from group 1 was very similar to group 7. The main difference I noticed was how the wording was different, due to how individuals have different thought processes, but the content and meaning of the paraphrase was mostly the same.
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
|
|
Group 3
|
0 |
Oct 24 2008, 12:03 PM EDT by
|
|
|
Thread started: Oct 24 2008, 12:03 PM EDT
Watch
their first sentences its different than the rest of the groups, they dind't use the name of the author. They also remark the age of the young generation. They paraphrase more than my group and use less quotes.
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
|
|
What ideas differ the most between the pages?
|
0 |
Oct 24 2008, 12:03 PM EDT by
|
|
|
Thread started: Oct 24 2008, 12:03 PM EDT
Watch
Chris Armstrong Group 1 This group used wording that was a little bit more specific and harder to understand, but in doing so, they have kept a lot of the original meaning of what Bauerlein was trying to say.
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
|
|
Differences (Between) Group 4 & Group 7
|
0 |
Oct 24 2008, 12:03 PM EDT by
|
|
|
Thread started: Oct 24 2008, 12:03 PM EDT
Watch
The only difference that I can see, if anything, is the focus of my group’s paragraph compared to your group’s paragraph. We wrote more on the "mental noise" in a Millennials life. Yours seems to have more focus on the "old way of thinking." It’s not wrong just different. We did some similar paraphrasing too. For example, we used the same quote in the same way: "Multitasking and interactivity." We both presented this quote as becoming a part of this "new generation's" lives.
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
|
|
Paraphrasing Bauerlein (Group 6)
|
0 |
Oct 24 2008, 12:02 PM EDT by
|
|
|
Thread started: Oct 24 2008, 12:02 PM EDT
Watch
Our groups pretty much had the same ideas, just different words. We both focused on interpreting it in different ways but in the end, they're both really about the same thing. Which, it's supposed to be right? This group didn't use a whole lot of quotes, we used more, and this group did interpret more of Bauerlein's actual words.
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
rsquillace |
|
Differences between Group 1 and you!
|
0 |
Oct 24 2008, 12:02 PM EDT by
rsquillace |
|
|
Thread started: Oct 24 2008, 12:02 PM EDT
Watch
First off, you gave a page number for your paraphrasing after a lot of sentences. We only used page numbers after direct quotes from the text. Some of the sentences you gave almost a word for word paraphrase of what Bauerlein said, while we just paraphrased the basic idea of the sentence. Also, our last sentences were very different. You used specific examples that he gave, while we paraphrased those examples.
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
JuliHladik |
|
What ideas differ the most between you and your peers?
|
0 |
Oct 24 2008, 12:01 PM EDT by
JuliHladik |
|
|
Thread started: Oct 24 2008, 12:01 PM EDT
Watch
Juli Hladik, Group 4 One overall content difference between group one and group four was I felt that there group's paraphrase included content that was easier to understand. They used simpler words to relay the same ideas, making it easier for anyone to understand. Although I feel this simplicity of language may have caused the content to lose some of its potency, or deeper meaning. A similarity that is quite apparent is the overall idea. Every sentence means the same thing and it is just written in a different manner.
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
|
|
Analysis
|
0 |
Oct 24 2008, 12:01 PM EDT by
|
|
|
Thread started: Oct 24 2008, 12:01 PM EDT
Watch
Representing Group 6 They group causes exclusivity to internet in the second sentence. My group did not believe Bauerlein was being limited to internet but rather all technology that develops teenagers.
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
|
|
Paraphrasing
|
0 |
Oct 24 2008, 12:01 PM EDT by
|
|
|
Thread started: Oct 24 2008, 12:01 PM EDT
Watch
Group 3- Malia Hacker The main point of this Paragraph was very similar to ours, even some of the quotes and word choice used was used in our paragraph as well. The difference in the two paragraphs is that this paragrpah is a little bit more direct and right to the point while ours is more of explaining. Also, the wording in the two paragraphs differ.
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
mirandaheby |
|
Comments
|
0 |
Oct 24 2008, 12:00 PM EDT by
mirandaheby |
|
|
Thread started: Oct 24 2008, 12:00 PM EDT
Watch
Miranda Eby (group 2): You really to things he said and explained them out which made your really long. We did that too, though I think yours is longer.
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|